
Re: Guide: How to Get YOUR Free Repair
First of all you have the wrong impression about the way companies think about "you." "You" are not a person, but rather a number. This is true for all government agencies as well. Forget about any previous thoughts you may have had regarding how businesses think about you as a person, "they" are not individuals who care about people, the business is interested in profits, about sales and as long as sales are up, as long as money is being made there is no problem that is so great that it can make a dent big enough to draw attention to a person in the business who can make decisions regarding the individual customer base and customer care that cannot be managed by replacing a computer or two here and there.
Problems occasionally crop up with a product that result in a recall or a warranty extension, similar to that which many of us currently are experiencing, but until it reaches a scale that generates enough of an economic impact on the company, there really is no problem for the company that cannot be handled by a few customer service representatives, managers, or even in this case Mark Hurd who can give a total replacement to the trouble makers he sees in his future.
The only problem that a company can have in the nature of the issue we are dealing with in this "forum" is if the number of units were so great, a hypothetical situation would be if an entire company had purchased units that went bad and H.P. refused to do anything about it, for instance. This would of course look bad to the shareholders, to whom H.P. must answer.
Hewlett Packard does not have to answer to a handful of unhappy customers whose laptops went south, so to speak, shortly after or even just before the warranty was up, and they did not even have to issue a notice of the enhanced warranty, because they, " according to their survey of customers who would want to be notified of a warranty enhancement offer, only 30% would want to be notified of this option." I was informed of this, verbatim.
I have worked in the warranty division for over 50 major product lines and I know how this stuff works. However, there is an unresolved issue here and I have not paid to have my unit repaired because of this very important issue. This issue is as follows;
H.P knows that the NVIDIA card is defective and in many cases has caused the failure of the motherboard in its units.
H.P. will replace the defective NVIDIA card with the same defective NVIDIA card when a unit is sent in for repair, at the customer's expense or even for free in some cases.
Regardless of the manner in which arrangements for the cost of the repair is made, be it at the customer's expense or at no expense to the customer, the problem is still that a defective part, a known to be defective part, is being used in the repair of the computer, and while the warranty given, likely a 90 day warranty for the "new parts" is nice, a mere token given the fact that the defective part is still in place in the customer's computer and the computer will possibly experience over-heating again at some point and imminent falure of the motherboard is likely once again.
So, now that we have a clear picture of just how much the customer is valued by Hewlett Packard, the company values the consumer enough to continue providing defective parts and has the gall to charge the customer for this "service" or rather a disservice, because it is an insult to the intelligence of the customer, to the pocketbook of the customer and to the economy of the nation, to continue to provide defective parts to a people whose wallets are already thin, and yet these very same people continue to put their trust into a company that is cheating them.
Hewlett Packard is cheating each person who accepts a unit with a defective part installed as a replacement for a unit that broke due to the same defective part being used in its initial manufacture. It is an insult to the employees of H.P., to the shareholders of H.P. stock, and to anyone who continues to purchase H.P products without knowing the policies and practices in which Hewlett Packard indulges, and remember, "you" are not anyone to H.P., you are a number, a figure in accounting.
If you wish to make changes I suggest removing emotion from this topic, as difficult as this may be, but logic must be employed if results are to be had. I am working on it. I am devoted to obtaining results, not hysteria, not a replacement here or there. I want reform in practice, by H.P. I want H.P. to cease in the practice of using defective parts in the assembly of its computers. I will do what I can to achieve this goal and if everyone can please write direct, logical letters about this either to me or to Mark Hurd about the items I have clearly laid out, it is appreciated and more likely to achieve the desired result, which is not my unit being fixed, but all units being made without defective parts.
Thank you.
Nicole Wagner
squaldo@comcast.net